Pres. Obama’s electoral staff invited us to meet Julia.

Who and what is the Julia’s real prototypes?  Or, less politically correct speaking, “Who the hell is “Julia,” and why am I paying for her whole life?”

She looks like modern “emancipated – liberated” woman without husband (“married to the state” as pointed out the article commentator). Her electoral propensities are well illuminated by the table below:

Subgroup	Bush, 2000	Bush, 2004	Obama 2008	McCain 2008
Overall	48	51	53	46
Men	52	56	50	50
Women	45	48	57	43
Married	57	60	44	56
Not married	36	40	65	35
Married men	59	61	42	58
Unmarried men	49	45	63	37
Married women	56	58	47	53
Unmarried women	31	36	66	34
Attend church   weekly	56	63	45	55
Attend church   nearly weekly/monthly	51	55	51	49
Seldom/Never   attend church	41	40	62	38

Sources  – Gallup polls:  http://www.gallup.com/poll/112132/Election-Polls-Vote-Groups—2008.aspx ; http://www.gallup.com/poll/13957/How-Americans-Voted.aspx.

So, definitely, unmarried Julia, relying on the government and heavily “invested” by the latter is natural obama-voter.

The strategy to reward their own hardcore liberal voters on the independent entrepreneurs’ cost is quite rational for Obama and for American leftists.  They grab from their enemies to reward friends. I believe, Obama’s electoral staff addresses the potential pro-liberal activists,  publicizing the message. The decision to target potential activists, ignoring all the rest voters looks quite reasonable on this stage of the campaign.

The question is, how self-made Americans and their devoted wives could defend their life-style, is still unanswered.

Would m-r Romney’s administration actually ready to divorce Julia, to save US budget, to save Julia’s real family and her chances to be happy? Or his best is “to cut program like … by 20%”?

For more information, wait for our book‘s Chapters 11 and 12 translations. It is coming soon!